Gay Marriage is all about Horseshoes.
Growing up has much to do with understanding disappointing results. Illustration. A teacher gives a arithmetic pop quiz first thing in the school day. The sum of a list of numbers to be added is correctly, 78. Student’s answer is 77. Grade is “F.” First thought of the student is, “Well, it’s close.” But, then is learned that “close” only counts in the game of Horseshoes.
Marriage, when stripped of all the current civil rights blarney, is about sex. And sex is about physical mechanics. Nature, and I will please Liberals and avoid the use of a term like God, or Creator, provides that one human, a woman, carries the body apparatus to engage in sexual intercourse utilizing the body apparatus of another human, a man, the consequence of which nature intended is open to the procreation of an offspring, incubated by the female.
Under no physical sexual circumstance does the Gay couple in union equal the physical sexual circumstance of the “nature” provided union of a man and a woman. Thus, the Gay use of “marriage” as a defining term is all about the game of Horseshoes; close.
After the gay community co-opts the word marriage, common law will provide for a marriage definition in two parts because the law cannot handle a word-meaning with diametrically opposite understandings. Sexual marriage in compliance with nature cannot be equal to sexual marriage in defiance of nature.
Natural marriage, or unnatural marriage.
